Sustainable Bites 1.11.23
Welcome to our biweekly round-up of food, sustainability and hospitality news bites. Dig in…
The amuse bouche
-
Report reveals climate tipping points are unnervingly close
-
Open letter calls for more food focus at COP28
-
EU caged farming ban put on hold
-
European plastics plan largely ignores need for reduction and reuse
-
Study finds small diet changes can have significant impact
And for the main…
Report reveals climate tipping points are unnervingly close
Released on October 25th, the Interconnected Disaster Risks Report from the UNU’s Institute for the Environment and Human Security states that critical risk tipping points for climate, ecosystems and technologies are closer than we might expect. The report defines these as the moments when “the systems that we rely on for our lives and societies cannot buffer risks and stop functioning like we expect it to”.
Calling on world leaders, policy-makers and industry to abandon delay tactics and address root causes, the report highlights the use of fossil fuels and the over-exploitation of natural resources as urgent areas for action. The report stresses the need for bold choices that will reimagine whole systems, transforming them with the goal of long-term sustainability.
“In each case […] avoiding the risk tipping point will require more than a single solution. We will need to integrate actions across sectors in unprecedented ways in order to address the complex set of root causes and drivers of risk, and promote changes in established mindsets.”
The report outlines seven key drivers of risk – all linked to an economic system that puts profit before everything else, to the detriment of our environment. The drivers are insufficient future planning, atmospheric and ocean warming, risk-intensifying land use, pollution, a lack of regulation and enforcement, a lack of information, and living and working in at-risk areas.
The report points the way towards a future in which people everywhere have a deeper connection with nature and where waste of any kind is relegated to the past. In this vision for a better future, decision-makers would no longer be guided by profits but would instead see themselves as stewards for future generations.
Open letter calls for more food focus at COP28
In a joint open letter to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 70 organisations and high-profile individuals – including WWF, WRAP, Unilever and EIT Food – called for food systems to be placed at the centre of discussions around climate change goals.
“Our food systems are a critical lever to deliver the Paris Agreement and build a sustainable, equitable and resilient future that enables people and nature to prosper,” the letter opens.
It notes that “the science is clear” that we will not reach Paris Agreement goals without reducing emissions from food systems and harnessing the adaptation and mitigation potential of land. “Food systems are a significant contributor to the climate crisis, accounting for one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time, they are also vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, which undermines food security and adaptation.”
The letter demands that the outcomes of COP28 “must include a clear way forward to spur ambitious food systems transformation nationally.” It urges Parties to:
-
Integrate a holistic approach to food systems within the Sharm el-Sheikh Joint Work on Implementation of Climate Action on Agriculture and Food Security (SSJW). This approach should at a minimum encompass nature-positive food production, healthy sustainable diets and nutrition, and food loss and waste.
-
Include food systems actions into National Adaptation Plans (NAPs), National Determined Contribution (NDCs), and Long-Term Strategies before COP30. At a national level, countries need to create and implement policies and incentives for sustainable food production, reducing food loss and waste, shifting towards healthy and sustainable diets, conserving and restoring ecosystems and scaling healthy soil practices.
Held in Dubai, COP28 – the latest round of UN global climate negotiations – will kick off at the end of November, focusing on the gaps in the implementation of the 2015 Paris Agreement. In September, a stocktake report by the UN said the world was behind on progress towards climate targets, demanding action from every country to keep global temperature increases within 1.5˚C.
At a recent briefing in Beijing, Head of the Climate Office at China's Ministry of Ecology and Environment Xia Yingxian called for countries to refrain from empty words and instead implement a practical approach to climate change, saying that developed countries “have an unshirkable responsibility for global climate change and at the same time have the actual ability to deal with climate change”.
EU caged farming ban put on hold
A joint investigation by the Guardian, Italy’s IrpiMedia, and a media consortium led by Lighthouse Reports has uncovered how meat lobby groups aggressively pushed back on a proposed EU ban on the caged farming of animals like hens and pigs, which has now been put on hold – despite the majority of EU citizens supporting the ban.
In 2021 – following a petition from 1.5 million people across Europe – the EU endorsed a resolution that would ban caged farming. In early 2023, the EU Commission officially committed to set out a legislative proposal, which was set to go through by the end of this year. The laws included would abolish keeping farm animals in cages, slaughtering day-old chicks and the sale and production of fur. In September, an EU survey found that 89% of citizens were still in support of this.
Three EU officials allege that European Livestock Voice (ELV) and its partner associations pushed back to water down parts of the laws and attack scientific opinions that didn’t align with their goals. One has described it as the first time in a decade-long career that they felt such intensive pressure from a farming group.
Anja Hazekamp, Vice-Chair of the EU Parliament’s environment committee, said: “Industry fought really hard and dirty on this file. They tried everything they could think of because they know we desperately need animal welfare legislation to make our food system more sustainable and humane, and this was their last chance. They don’t want to change, but see that change is inevitable so they’re getting desperate. They will do anything to save their skins.”
Research consistently shows that EU citizens care about animal farming regulations and are even willing to pay more for products created under higher standards of welfare standards – things like providing animals with more space to move around, better housing conditions, and shorter transport journeys.
The deadline set by the EU to enforce the bans has now been missed. Aside from legislation around the transportation of animals due to be proposed before the end of 2023, the rest have been scrapped from the Commission’s work programme for next year.
European plastics plan largely ignores need for reduction and reuse
Plastics Europe – the trade body representing 90% of Europe’s plastic producers – has published plans to reduce emissions and to increase circularity by 2050, without any targets for decreasing production rates or increasing rates of reuse.
The Plastics Transition document includes a 28% reduction in lifecycle emissions by 2030 (from 2019 levels), building to a 55% reduction by 2050. It says that residual emissions could be addressed using a mix of offsetting and onsite carbon capture and storage technologies. This is modest compared to the Science-Based Targets initiative’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard, which calls for companies to commit to a 90% reduction in absolute emissions across all scopes by 2050 at the latest.
At present, more than 80% of the feedstocks used to produce plastics are fossil-based. Plastics Europe believes this proportion could be brought down to 35% in 2050, envisaging mechanically and chemically recycled plastics accounting for almost half of production – a strategy that relies heavily on assumed rapid scaling of these technologies. The plan is also reliant on rapid growth in bioplastics, and on plastics made using captured carbon becoming commercially available at scale in the 2030s.
While UNEP’s roadmap for slashing global plastic pollution rates by 80% by 2040 does note the importance of scaling both mechanical and chemical recycling, it also includes a 10% reduction in the production of short-lived plastics products by 2027, with at least 20% of these replaced with reusables and the rest with alternative materials.
The Plastics Transition plan does acknowledge that reuse is likely to increase in the coming decades – but it sets no specific targets in terms of reducing production and increasing reuse, including neither as a key indicator of circularity. The Plastics Europe website maintains that “plastics remain irreplaceable for many applications”.
Zero Pollution policy manager at Zero Waste Europe Janek Vähk said: "In a stark contradiction to the urgent need for sustainability, the Plastics Europe roadmap for Plastics in Europe advocates for the unabated expansion of plastic production and a continued reliance on fossil-based plastics (one-third of the production). Our latest research [...] reveals a stark reality: to align with these budgets, the demand for plastics cannot grow. Instead, we must pivot towards a future where plastic consumption decreases by 3% each year, ultimately halving annual consumption by 2050. The majority of this transition should be achieved through the elimination of unnecessary plastics and a steady fast move towards a thriving reuse economy."
A sweet treat to finish…
Study finds small diet changes can have significant impact
According to a new study published in Nature Food, making simple substitutions like switching from beef to chicken or drinking plant-based alternatives to cow's milk could reduce the average American's food-related carbon footprint by 35%, while also boosting diet quality.
The study analysed dietary data from over 7,700 Americans, identifying commonly eaten foods with the highest climate impact and then simulating the impact of replacing them with nutritionally similar, lower-emission options. The results highlight the potential of a "small change" approach that could be more palatable and achievable for consumers, encouraging more people to adopt climate-friendly eating habits.
"This study shows that cutting dietary carbon emissions is accessible and doesn't have to be a whole lifestyle change," said Diego Rose, senior author and Nutrition Programme Director at Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine. "It can be as simple as ordering a chicken burrito instead of a beef burrito when you go out to eat. When you're at the grocery store, move your hand one foot over to grab soy or almond milk instead of cow's milk. That one small change can have a significant impact."
Identifying healthy alternatives to high-carbon foods was not an objective for the study, but swapping to lower carbon foods also showed "sizable improvements” in the healthfulness of the diets. "There is overlap between sustainable diets and healthy diets," said Anna Grummon, lead author and Assistant Professor of Paediatrics and Health Policy at Stanford University. "Our study shows that changing just one ingredient, making one swap, can be a win-win, resulting in meaningful changes in both climate outcomes and how healthy our diets are."
For more updates from the worlds of food, sustainability and hospitality, follow us on Instagram and LinkedIn, and be sure to sign up for The Sustainable Dish, our biweekly newsletter keeping you in the loop on news from The Sustainable Restaurant Association.